http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/200 ... ath_th.php
Two photos, one before, one after (click-on to enlarge)
San Francisco Slips Beneath the Waves -- But This Is a Good Thing
By Joe Eskenazi in Celebrities
Wednesday, Apr. 8 2009 @ 8:30AM
Just as cranks who warn us we're playing with our lives for living in the natural disaster Mecca that is California predicted, San Francisco yesterday sank beneath the waves of the Pacific and headed for the bottom of the ocean.
But that's okay. San Francisco is a submarine.
The U.S.S. San Francisco -- and we'll leave it to you to make your own jokes about the Navy's decision to name a submarine after the nation's most gay-friendly city -- steamed out of Bremerton, Wash. yesterday en route for its new home port of San Diego. The 30-year-old sub had been docked in the Pacific Northwest for a three-and-a-half year rehabilitation following a near catastrophic 2005 accident in which it ran, full speed, into an undersea mountain near its old home port of Guam. That collision killed one sailor, injured 97 others, and gravely damaged the sub.
While the Navy would probably be pleased if the U.S.S. San Francisco didn't embody many of the characteristics of its namesake city, it does, fittingly enough, stand as a triumph of recycling. The San Francisco's destroyed nose section was replaced with the salvaged nose of the decommissioned U.S.S. Honolulu (Incidentally, the San Francisco is a "Los Angeles-Class sub" -- and it just had a nose job. So that fits, too).
Sadly, also in line with San Francisco's spend-happy ways, the cost of replacing the sub's nose was $134 million -- up from an estimated 79 million in 2006.
Finally, unlike its namesake city, the commander in charge of the sub spends much of his time, literally, in San Francisco.